CO129-534-9 Law of Piracy- case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong 1-4-1931 - 20-4-1932 — Page 5

5

Mr. Burke that this is Care the Rascals - whoten

Ins, but Swill look into tulases acain before the letusgo.

take it poss

Jaho like twee the 71s.

#lo

Yes

Pressing"

lur

Curernally, the released. to rearrested if the Pring Can it

of A. reviors the judgmat

Hay Hay const: and con

they

then to natinent in

retried.

Inr. Basher

މ

Walter Dr. Ellis

Piracy is frequent in the China

I think both the led

would back us

Admically

yeas <

& Ha A.7.

this judgment

trying to get

a/set.

Yes. Bollin

Shall

come

to way

appeal

write to both best!

we propose, if horrible, &-

ask for

the vines abent –

legislation if we fail?

17.6.31

Gę

Japee. What I feel about acting thlaw is

that it wood be difficult to tho Fang li alter the fececial law yung on a Judgment from ItK.

of the DC uphold it - Amit will be a different-

と

maler.

Shall we at the dametine tel: HR onli

discover then view about an affeal? They will

have to pay! His 18/6,

furt G.G. 18.6.01.